Sunday, 29 November 2009
SourceForge.net: Piano Roll: pianoroll Project: Admin: Manage Donations
Wednesday, 9 September 2009
Number strings, Music and the Great Library
“Who’s asking?” inquired a voice from behind the smoke.
“Are you the private investigator Christian-Joseph Métisse?” demanded the man at the door, still in his almost artificially calm, quiet voice.
“Yes” my boss eventually conceited."""
This is hardly great fiction, but only seed number 31065 of this experiment (found through automated checking) it shows that randomization can create intelligible works. In a musical sense the word algorithm used in my example could be directly related to a rhythm algorithm and likewise the sequencing algorithm to a scale / pitch-set algorithm. As such the experiment in its current state focuses on generation in general, rather than atonality. If a comparison was made between language and music, with single notes likened to letters or phonemes then the comparison between the vocabulary and tonality would logically follow. If the overall algorithm was changed so that the words would be generated by random strings of letters then the algorithm would take longer to create intelligible text, because rules stipulating letter successions to from sensible phonemes would need to be created in order to generate plausable words. With this algorithm it would be possible to generate a good amount of sensible text. This is comparable to music, using note relations and sequences to generate musical phrases. The result would sound somewhere between (in my modeling so far at least!) Wagner and Webern. Using existing words is less comparable to music in this sense as using predetermined words would be like using existing musical phrases, or to put it another was musical theft. If this was to happen then the "word" like phrases would show a bias to tonality as the majority of existing musical material is tonally based, and the creation of a tonal piece would prove only that tonal structures are historically prominent, rather than disprove atonalities validity.
The experiment isn't yet far enough complete to provide any real conclusion, and I'm far too tired to continue working tonight, but expect and update / continuation in the coming weeks.
The Pigs Oppress
The Pigs Oppress
As every day I do, I descend trance like down the escalator
A routine movement so expected it almost doesn’t exist
But as I arrive past the point of no return, crowds building behind me; I see them
Their dirty hairy snouts violently twitched with greed, over fat with power
The haughty figures led dogs, by leads, by hoofs…
Menacing creatures with ominous teeth desperate to tear into flesh, noses sharp and wanting
The pigs used, leech like the poor dogs, with vindication and malice
Replacing the skills they had feigned tangentially to their increased responsibilities
Justice is a system, carefully measured and enforced fairly and forcefully
I had now arrived at the bottom of the escalator, and as I feared, the dogs squealed from their drooling mouth
I walked cautiously on, why should I stop
Consequently, I was surrounded; the yellow pigs encased me using their malicious dogs
They took my bag a forced me away to their homely bath of mud and stole my bag
They dogs sniffed me over thoroughly, almost violently harassing every crevasse of myself
They couldn’t find what they had hopped, so they allowed me to leave
I left; without my bag, but was unable to shake the added weight of loathing I now had.
I’m just glad the system approved of me
Proverb
The pigs may gluttonize, but unfortunately you will end up feeling the most sick.
Sunday, 19 July 2009
The Best Intentions...
The Best Intentions...
Thomas Stone
When a political party is in opposition, one of the best ways to increase support is to promise acts of parliament1 that will appeal to the electorate. Theses statutes normally exaggerate the party’s targets, resulting in an unrealistic manifesto2. And politicians; unlike those in industry, are not legally accountable3 for setting unattainable targets in their manifestos and pre election propaganda.
One example of a failed promise is ‘the reduction fares by 25% within 6 months’ on London’s buses and tubes; taken from the 1981 Labour Party manifesto. This promise was initially implemented, but because of the idealistic budgeting set by the government it caused a £69,000,000 deficit, and the changes were abolished soon after being enforced. Some policies don’t even make it that far, and while it is a generally accepted principle of contemporary politics to set goals which are impossible of attainment; it strongly undermines the concept of democracy. An exaggeration might demonstrate my point…
Potentially a political party could promise a billion new jobs when in opposition; and then if elected, pass legislation making it illegal for any humans to work in the UK. An extremely unlikely scenario, but technically legal4. But an Open University paper so eloquently put it:
“The Government will have to account for broken election promises at the next election. They will also be held to account by the opposition parties and by the media. Thus, while there may not be legal consequences arising from a failure to implement pre-election promises, there may be considerable political consequences and the Government may lose the trust of the voting public.”
And finally, in all the cynicism of this article, lets not forget; it is only the minority of the policies that are abandoned, and consequently the system [sometimes] works.
1 Acts of Parliament, Statutes and Legislation are all the same thing
2 A document outlining the parts intentions, should they be elected into government
3 As stated by Lord Diplock “Elected representatives must not treat themselves as irrevocably bound to carry out pre-announced policies contained in election manifestos” amongst numerous other sources
4 Of course this is not the only way legislation is made, and if something like this was seriously entertained then numerous bodies could intervene: the Law Commission, the Private Members’ Bill and the Royal Commission.)